3 November 2005 - 16:11Radioactive Dating

It may sound like a dangerous form of courtship, but far from it.

Every living thing continuously exchanges carbon dioxide through food and air, going in and out.

But once the living thing dies, no more carbon going in — only out.

By literally counting how much carbon atoms (more precisely an unstable carbon isotopes known as carbon-14, but who’s being picky) decays, a time frame can be estimated.

closeup_carbon_large.gifWillard Frank Libby got a Nobel Price for figuring that out.

Sounds great?

So does sliced bread, but nobody got a Nobel for that one.

The problems with this technique is that results are often corrupt, bringing up uncomfortable questions: time and the environment influence the decaying speed, solar flairs may change the amount of carbon in the atmosphere, etc, ad infinitum.

Britain’s Science and Engineering Research Council once sent out a sample of a known age to 38 labs, and only seven returned “satisfactory” results.

Fortunately amber has a decaying process not overly influenced by heat or humidity. This should reduce the error margin when dating amber the Radiocarbon way.

But geologists are well aware of the final and most striking problem with using C14 Radiocarbon Dating: the measurable age limit is in the range of 60,000 years, when any measurable carbon as fled the dead object.

Obviously, amber doesn’t make the cut.

So what gives?

1 Comment | Tags: blue amber

2 November 2005 - 16:05We Dig Mother Earth At Any Age

It seems that Mother Earth is like most women: often moody, mostly incomprehensible and she doesn’t like to admit her age.

Well, okay, I don’t know about most women, but it certainly applies to Momma Earth.

In fact she hates it so much, she endlessly undergoes surgery to remove any possible hints of age, what with her shifting, reforming and changing crust all the time.

history.gifThe oldest rock we were lucky enough to find, a tough little zircon crystal picked up in Australia, was measured at 4.4 billion years according to its uranium decay.

So if she doesn’t want to give out her age, what do nosy scientists do?

They ask her little daughter, the moon.

After all, Luna is literally a chip off the old block, having broken away in a collision with the hypothetical planet Theia – an event aptly known as the Big Whack.

Or so the most recent theories say.

Moon samples brought back by the Apollo missions say earth may be 4 billion years old, as close as we can peg it.

But geologists swear not by the moon, the inconstant moon.

Other sources are also questioned of course, such as the highly independent meteorites. Nothing is left out.

The 12-zero-figures determined of all three sample elements correlate somewhat, putting Momma Earth’s age at somewhere between 4 and 5 billion.

closeup_blueamber_large.jpgMore or less.

Approximately.

Sort of.

But that is just the technicality we are trying to dig up: the difference between 4 billion and 5 billion for example is, well, 1 billion.

As Ted Turner put it, that’s “a nice round number.”

Isn’t that a bit much to be vague about?

Well, compared to the age of the rest of the universe, it’s a fairly small error margin. We’re still learning, and Momma Earth is no easy lady to deal with.

Still, with these margins, don’t ever lend a geologist money — they consider a million years to be recent.

1 Comment | Tags: blue amber

1 November 2005 - 0:54Dating A Fossil: Always Flatter — You don’t look a day over 20 million!

Geologists are Amazing

They know hundreds of words for different sorts of dirt and hundreds of words for things it does when left alone for a few million eons. And geologists and Ted Turner have one thing in common: they love to toss those millions around as if they were pennies.

Well, they have to. By the 1800s “Uhm” and “cough-cough” and “it’s a mystery” and “6,000” no longer sounded plausible as answers to the age of the world. So geologists began throwing out numbers so preposterously large, they just had to be correct. And since then rock hunters have figured that millions are so very cool and have adapted their own finds and theories to fit that time frame.

But how old is Dominican amber, really? Can we take the geological numbers for granite? Where do these preposterous numbers even come from?

history.gifDo we even know its age?

If someone wishes to push the point, then no we don’t, not for certain. It’s all Guessing.

But in all fairness, it’s very Educated Guessing.

There’s a difference.

So how old is amber really?

Submitted for your approval, here are a few articles on the most common amber dating techniques guiding our contemporary estimates. If you have time to browse a few, please feel free to do so — if not, you may skip right to the end of this article and take our word for it.

Article

Ages

We Dig Mother Earth at Any Age

4-5 billion

Radioactive Dating

N/A

Getting an Enemar

40-60 million

May the Quartz be With You

20 million

A Redisposition of the Redeposition

100 million

The Exclusion of the Inclusion

15-20 million

Right-to-Left, If You Please!

N/A

Geologists Have Faults Too

It is sad really, but we have yet much to learn before we can fully understand earth’s aging process. There are of course about 40+ dating techniques, yet those that can be applied to Dominican amber are still ambiguous at best and suggestive at worst.

The conclusion is that practically every dating technique has its ups and downs and its valid points; every age can in some way be argued as correct. None are superior to the other and it’s only the combination of all of them that give us an Educated Guess.

Geology (also known as the School of Rock) has the (nasty?) habit of hammering dating-results into its preconceived geological time frame. Sarcastic as I try to be, there is little reason to presently doubt this time-frame (far-fetched it may sound at times). The closeup_blueamber_large.jpgnumbers suggested range anywhere between 100 million to as young as 10 million, but the most commonly agreed upon number for Dominican Amber is pegged at 20 - 30 million, critiques notwithstanding.

More or less. Approximately. Sort of.

You get the picture. The true answer for the age of amber remains as elusive now as it did at the beginning of this article, only more so.

_________________________________

A few Citations:

  • Manuel A. Iturralde-Vennet 2001. Geology of the Amber-Bearing Deposits of the Greater Antilles. Caribbean Journal of Science, Vol. 00, No. 0, 141-167, 2001

  • Jackman, T.R., Larson, A., de Queiroz, K., and Losos, J.B. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships and tempo of early diversification in Anolis lizards. Systematic Biology, 48:254-285.

  • Roughgarden, L. 1995. Anolis lizards of the Caribbean: ecology, evolution, and plate tectonics. Oxford University Press.

    Martin, G.E; Zekter, A.S., Two-Dimensional NMR Methods for Establishing Molecular Connectivity; VCH Publishers, Inc: New York, 1988 (p.59)

  • C. Tuniz, J.R Bird, D.Fink, and G.F Herzog. 1998. Accelerator Mass Spectrometry: Ultrasensitive analysis for global science. CRC Press.

  • Badash, Lawrence. 1968, “The origin of radioactive dating techniquesAm. Philos. Soc. Proc. 112(3), pp.158-169.

  • Joseph P. Hornak, Ph.D. “The basics of NMR” 1997-2004 http://www.cis.rit.edu/htbooks/nmr/

No Comments | Tags: blue amber

1 October 2005 - 0:48Turning Blue: A (fairly) Novel Theory

Green amber? Blue Amber? On the color spectrum green and blue are very close, hence the reason for both colors must be the same. And every argument leads to the same conclusion, the same cause: heat. But at what point was the amber put under such intense heat?

closeup_cabus_large.jpgTo explain Blue Amber we might want to line out the general history of amber, according to the gospel of geology. Of course all points are either uncertain or still heavily debated, which comes to show just how little we really know about this fickle planet we call home.

Weeping Hymenaea Protera

It is generally accepted that a very large extinct tree known as the Hymenaea Protera is responsible for squeezing out these large amounts of resin. We know this from flower petals found inside the amber that compare to the still-growing Algorrobo tree, a great-great-grandson of the H. protera. Using the contemporary Algorrobo as an analogy we can establish an approximate whodunit. The roots and trunk exude a yellowish to red resin and form hard lumps which become buried in the soil at the tree base. Large amounts of that resin have been found, hardened into copal, and it is this copal that sometimes is sold as amber to the fleeceable tourists–but it is yet a far cry from the real deal.

closeup_flat_large.jpgAs a matter of fact, it is unlikely that this copal would ever turn into amber, for the copal of the extinct H. protera needed to go through an odyssey that would have had Homer shake in his sandals.

It is interesting to note that Algorrobo do not bleed much unless struck by lightning. The assumption is that either lightning or a fire caused a whole forest to practically bleed to death and hemorrhage such large amounts of resin. Several unlucky creatures from various genus eventually got stuck in the gluey gunk and bought it right there. Little ash or other proof that there had been such a fire has been found in amber, but maybe Blue Amber is it. Maybe it was the heat of the fires that induced changes in the molecular structure, that later would cause the blue coloration? Pure speculation at this point. Onward in the odyssey.

Comatillo Basin

closeup_comatillio_basin.jpgFor the copal to maintain its clear appearance and the enclosures therein, it had to be quickly protected from weather. That happened indeed, ironically thanks to the weather. Frequent rains washed the top soil around trees down-slope into lagoonal and coastal areas of the Comatillo Basin. This basin is believed to have been located in the northern part of what is now Hispaniola, and it would be logical to assume that the Hymenaea sprout along the hillsides and the copal washed into said lagoon. Copal floats in salt water, so the question is how it ended up at the bottom of the basin. Possible it was pulled down by attached soil or decayed wood after bobbing for a while in the sea and so sank into the deep-water deposits where it was more and more covered by layers of sand and lignite. This step of the process could not haven taken more then a few days.

The next step is calculated in millions of years.

Goin’ down?

1neckless_large.jpg6 to 20 million years ago, a shooting-from-the-hip estimate, amber was still called copal and the enclosed insects where just getting cozy in it. Hispaniola on the other hand was nonexistent. Most likely there was a whole series of smaller islands, created a few million years earlier by a massive head-on collision between the Caribbean and the North American tectonic plates. On one of these islands our above forest of ancient Algorrobo was flourishing. Let’s call this prehistoric island, oh say, Atlantis.

Erm… no relations to Plato.

No really.

As the old real estate axiom says, it’s all in location, location, location. The Comatillo Basin was somewhere in the northern middle of Atlantis and seemingly the only location for copal to undergo its complete transformation into amber. Of course there are minor amber finds in Cuba and Puerto Rico, but for some reason only in the Comatillo Basin on Atlantis the circumstances were perfect.

closeup_egg_large.jpgAs stated above, the copal had by now hit rock bottom and begun to dig, so to speak. It was going deeper into its marine environment, with tons of water pushing down as well as more and more debris accumulating atop. It is estimated that the copal went down up to 300 feet in depth, and it was down here that it finally began its diagenic changes. The depth and pressure practically baked the copal, until–ping!–it had fossilized into amber.

It is generally assumed that the blue coloration was caused by lava flowing over the location of these copal deposits, but we see from this model that that is unlikely.

Then maybe the heat from pressure and depth?

closeup_large_large.jpgThis heat certainly causes the copal to become amber in the first place, but had it also caused the blue coloration, then all of the amber would have to be blue.

Goin’ up?

After a few million years the tectonic plates, like an unhappy card player, had once again reshuffled. Up became down and down became up. Large parts of Atlantis began to–you know–disappear into the ocean, while other parts finally broke surface and headed for the sky. The bottom of the Comatillo Basin became mountain ranges, pushing the amber deposits into the clouds. This would explain why the soil in which amber is found contains planktonic and marine microorganisms, and sometimes even mollusks and other marine animals, fish teeth, even fossils of crocodiles, turtles and dugongs.

closeup_cat_large.jpgAfter rising out of the ocean, nature began to chew on the sea-bottom-turned-mountain-range. Rain, wind and even digging animals began to shape the ranges into what we know now as the Cordilleras Septentrional and Oriental. Dirt broke free and amber pieces were redeposited in rivers and other locations were they were at last found by first the native Taino Indians, and later by European explorers. Said exploiters, erm, explorers already knew amber from the Baltic and only ventured after gold, which is why little amber was mined for the first 500 years. But over time, that too changed.

closeup_green_large.jpgThe rest is still history in the making.

So why is it blue?

Recent discoveries and advanced hypotheses about the origin of amber such as the one by geologist Manuel A. Iturralde-Vennet lined out in the above paragraphs suggest that previous assumptions concerning Blue Amber may no longer apply. Volcanic activity on Hispaniola or Atlantis (of course I’m only kidding, but you can see why some Atlanteans insist on Hispaniola being said neckless_large.jpgmythical place) had pretty much seized by the Miocene epoch, so the heat that caused the molecular changes must have a different origin. Common sense suggests the smoke and heat during the excretion of resin. This would also explain the lack of enclosures in Blue Amber, as well as the swirls of resin and pulverized fragments classical to Blue Amber because of repeated liquefaction of the copal.

Thus far the gospel of geology. Much of the above is an estimate of what is at this time humanly possible to evaluate. Perhaps in the future further questions as to the origin of Blue Amber, and indeed amber, will be answered. For now we can but only revere in the beauty that is this unique gem.

1 Comment | Tags: blue amber

1 September 2005 - 0:46Trapped Mosquito: The Jurassic Park Myth

Now that’s what I call a pile of crap.”
–Ian Malcom, Jurassic Park

You’ll be hard pressed to find someone who has not at least heard or even seen the original Steven Spielberg movie Jurassic Park or one of its sequels: cloned dinos run rampage, chew on extras and then let the main characters get away. Lather, rinse, repeat for the sequels. Cheese galore.

But the movie introduced the idea that dino DNA was hiding inside mosquitoes locked in amber. And the amber the movie chose was (are you holding your breath?) Dominican. One scene even introduces the viewer to an amber mine in the DR by the name of Mano de Dios (no such mine) alongside a river bed (no amber mines along river beds, they’re all in the mountains) and miners with lovely Mexican accents (this is the DR after all) in a very gold-mine looking kind of mine.

Anyone familiar with the reality of Dominican amber mines chuckles at this scene. And no, none of the scenes of the movie, not even the amber mine, were filmed in the DR, no matter how much some tourist guides will want to make you believe it (it is however known that location s couts visited the island during preproduction).

But the real bummer lies within the science. There are several plot holes large enough to swallow a herd of Parasaurolophus without a single burp, and our beloved amber leads the pack.

I t is generally accepted that Barney’s ancestors died out at the end of cretaceous period, 65 million years ago–“An adventure 65 million years in the making” the movie advertised. A few filibusters may have lived longer than that, but you know how it is with extinction: like tax day, it’s inevitable.

Both the movie as well as the Michael Crichton novel it is based upon now propose that mosquitoes suckled at the dinos and got trapped in resin only to end up as jewelry. All the scientists had to do was to drill into the fossilized resin and extract the dino DNA and — presto! — Dinos-R-(amongst)Us.

Found fodder for critics. They rip the movie and its science apart like a pack of Velociraptors would an unlucky Triceratops, what with missing DNA bits, unhappy chromosomes and impossible sequencings and the likes. But one of the most blundering mistakes is the amber itself.

Dominican amber is only 15 to 20 million years old and I don’t care if Baygon was already around or not: mosquitoes don’t live more than a few days at best. Hence it is unlikely that some skeeter managed to hang around 20 million years after feasting on Gallimimus before it got trapped in that sticky goo. A plot hole 20 million years wide.

But hold on! I hear the ardent fans cry from their movie seat: what if the amber is 65 million years old after all, and dinos and mosquitoes did share the cretaceous period? What if all the eggheads are wrong? After all, geologists love to throw around millions, just like Ted Turner.

I will indulge the notion but only for the length of the next paragraph (there are suggestions that Dominican amber may have originated during the cretaceous period.

If the amber mosquitoes did live alongside the dinos, then where are the dinos? Except for some crocodile and dugong bones (family of the manatees), there have never been any major dinosaur finds in the DR. No matter how old the amber and the skeeters are, there is no chance they could contain dino blood. As a matter of fact, it is assumed that much of the Caribbean was still submerged 65 million years ago, and/or according to tectonic plate movement still sitting somewhere near what is now the Galapagos.

Of course there have been mosquito-in-amber finds in other places that fit the era as well as location; say New Jersey. But these finds are rare, which is why Crichton used Dominican amber instead of any other: it’s the mot beautiful around and it has got the loveliest enclosures.

And I think because of that we’ll forgive his gaps, wont we?

No Comments | Tags: blue amber